Pages

Search This Blog

Translate

Search Tool




Oct 14, 2020

News | Business | Markets View: How the U.S. election could affect Europe's markets, economy and trade

 

Holly Ellyatt


President Donald Trump waves to the crowd as he leaves after speaking during a campaign event at the Orlando Sanford International Airport on October 12, 2020 in Sanford, Florida.

President Donald Trump waves to the crowd as he leaves after speaking during a campaign event at the Orlando Sanford International Airport on October 12, 2020 in Sanford, Florida.

Joe Raedle | Getty Images News | Getty Images

The forthcoming U.S. election matters not only for the American people and the country’s economy; the outcome of the vote in November will also have a significant impact across the Atlantic.

Europe’s financial markets and economic prospects will be affected by whoever enters (or remains) in the White House after the vote, according to economists and strategists.

Market uncertainty

U.S. politics are a “serious risk” to Europe’s economy, according to Berenberg Bank’s Chief Economist Holger Schmieding. He warned this week that a contested election outcome could lead to “serious uncertainty and significant street protests” in the U.S. by supporters of the losing side.

“If the result is close in key swing states, the lengthy count of postal ballots would become decisive. This would delay the result and may well open the door to legal and other complications. In the end, the Supreme Court may even have the final say,” he noted.

This, he said, “could temporarily hit markets and confidence beyond the U.S.”

The possibility of a contested election is being underestimated by markets, according to Steen Jakobsen, chief economist at Saxo Bank, and his team.

“We fear that the U.S. election is the biggest political risk we have seen in several decades,” Jakobsen said in a note last week. He outlined three probabilities between now and Inauguration Day on Jan. 20, 2021: a contested election, with a probability of 50%; a clean sweep by Democrat nominee Joe Biden, with a probability 25%; and a win by incumbent President Donald Trump, with a probability of 25%.

“Our job is to define consensus vs. reality and here we feel that the market is not properly pricing in both the risks of a contested result — the biggest risk for the markets, whether as a result of the contest itself or Trump’s objections and attempts to cry foul — or a clean sweep by Biden. Since both are a risk, this means volatility could rise dramatically,” he wrote.

Trade war?

Another issue at stake is trade. If Trump is re-elected there are fears he could start a trade war with Europe, as he has previously threatened to do, claiming last year that Europe has “in many ways” treated the U.S. “worse” than China.  

A trade war would be damaging to both the European and U.S. economies, though the EU stands to lose more if tariffs are imposed on its exports to the States.

The EU had a 153 billion euro ($180.3 billion) surplus with the U.S. (meaning it exports more to the U.S. than it imports) in 2019, according to data from Eurostat. EU exports to the U.S. in 2019 were worth around 384 billion euros, whereas U.S. imports to the EU were worth around 232 billion euros.

In addition to the trade of goods and services, “some U.S. tech giants made a significant share of their global profits on the EU market. In short, U.S.-EU relations matter a lot for both sides,” Berenberg’s Schmieding noted.

He said that the EU is “the only region which, in mercantilistic terms, could strike back at the U.S. almost like-for-like in a genuine trade war,” and this might prevent the U.S., if Trump were re-elected, from embarking on one.  

U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden delivers remarks at a Voter Mobilization Event campaign stop at the Cincinnati Museum Center at Union Terminal in Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S., October 12, 2020.

Tom Brenner | Reuters

Tax hikes

The NBC News national polling average suggests that Biden’s lead over Trump has topped 10 points. Biden is currently garnering support from 52.2% of registered voters, according to NBC, and Trump is at 41.6%.

A victory for Biden could bring with it another challenge for Europe, however, according to Schmieding. He said that a “blue wave” Democratic sweep could “potentially pave the way for major tax hikes in the U.S. and excessive labor market regulations that may curtail U.S. trend growth and affect export-oriented Europe.”

He said that Biden as president may undo Trump tax cuts, add further tax increases and pursue an expansionary spending and social policy.

“Many observers would see this as negative for markets and U.S. trend growth. Given the importance of the U.S. for the global and European economy and its markets, this could potentially have negative repercussions beyond the U.S.,” Schmieding added.

Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel (R) looks at US President Donald Trump (R) walking past her during a family photo as part of the NATO summit at the Grove hotel in Watford, northeast of London on December 4, 2019.

CHRISTIAN HARTMANN

Biden boost?

However, not everyone agrees with this analysis. UBS Asset Management’s strategic asset allocation team said the a Biden-led increase in taxes and public spending could give markets outside the U.S. a boost.

In a note last week, they predicted that the most likely outcome of the election was a Democratic clean sweep, putting the chance of a “blue wave” at 55%. They stressed that U.S. fiscal spending was “more important to the macroeconomic and the global market outlook than tax policy changes.”

German Chancellor Angela Merkel and U.S. President Donald Trump are seen as they pose for a family photo at the start of the NATO summit in Brussels, Belgium July 11, 2018.

Reinhard Krause | Reuters

A Biden victory would be positive for equity markets outside the U.S., they noted. “We ascribe 75% odds to Democratic nominee Joe Biden winning the presidency ... This outcome is likely to be associated with a weaker dollar and better relative performance for equities outside the U.S.,” they said.

“Any lack of immediate clarity on the election outcomes would not be a positive for risk assets, but we are not convinced that this dynamic is a reason to substantially reduce such exposures. That this volatility already appears to be priced in raises the bar for any political disruption to meaningfully roil markets.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.