Our Mission is to keep our audience with an interrupted stream of financial information from serious sources, with the objective to provide the tools and sufficient knowledge about investments in the financial markets. we inform you, for example, closing market reports(Asia Europe & U.S.) CNBC Selected News, The Guardian, Washington Post, New York Times Selected News, selected financial news and videos, the Fed, FDIC, SEC, FTC press releases and enforcement actions.
Personal Finance | Perspective | Will Social Security be around when I’m ready to retire?
By Michelle Singletary Michelle Singletary Personal finance columnist
and old are concerned that the safety net designed to keep people from
abject poverty is running out of money and may be shut down.
They aren’t wrong to worry.
Fifty-seven percent of retirees rely on Social Security as their primary source of income, according to a 2018 Gallup poll.
another Gallup survey, 51 percent of adults ages 50 to 64 said they
worry “a great deal” about Social Security’s stability. One-third of
adults ages 18 to 29 said they were worried, too.
frequently asked by readers whether they should count on Social
Security being around long enough for them to collect their benefits.
will soon be 62 years old, and recently heard Social Security will run
out of money in 2034,” one reader wrote. “I already know two women who
opted to take Social Security early so they could reap some benefits
before it ran out.”
The reserves for the Old-Age
and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund (OASI), which pays retirement and
survivor benefits, will be unable to pay full benefits in 2034,
according to the 2019 trustee report for the Social Security and
Medicare trust funds. Without a fix, OASI will have only enough
continuing tax income to pay out 77 percent of scheduled payments.
second Social Security program, the Disability Trust Fund, pays
disability benefits, and it’s in slightly better shape. The fund will
have enough money coming in to cover 91 percent of scheduled benefits
when its reserves are depleted in 2052. That’s a substantial improvement
over last year’s trustee report, which projected that disability
reserves would be depleted by 2032.
disability trust fund is healthier, in part, because of a decline in
applications, which have been decreasing since 2010. The number of
disabled-worker beneficiaries receiving payments has also decreased
since 2014, the trustees reported.
Security paid benefits of nearly $989 billion last year. At the end of
2018, both programs provided benefit payments to about 63 million
people: 47 million retired workers and dependents of retired workers, 6
million survivors of deceased workers and 10 million disabled workers
and dependents of disabled workers, according to the trustee report.
why we should be concerned: The total annual cost of both programs is
projected to exceed total annual income in 2020, the first time since
1982. Absent any intervention, the combined trust-fund reserves are
projected to run out in 2035, when there will only be enough income
coming in to pay 80 percent of benefits.
the projected shortfalls, there hasn’t been much movement by Congress
or the Trump administration to fix Social Security. Wait too long and
the shock of a fix might include higher Social Security taxes and/or
reduced benefits, which will certainly not go over well with the
American public. It will be painful and ugly.
the past decade, those seeking the presidency have focused their
rhetoric more on what they wouldn’t do to repair Social Security’s
finances than on what they would,” wrote Charles Blahous, senior
research strategist at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.
problem is that any fix will probably anger taxpayers, which is why
Congress and the White House have so little incentive to make changes to
Social Security. But rather than fight the good fight now, politicians
are kicking this very dented can down the road.
longer we wait to fix Social Security — can you imagine the
dysfunctional doofuses in Our Nation’s Capital allowing the trust fund
to go broke and have Social Security benefits sliced by more than 20
percent? — the greater the burden that will fall on younger people to
help pay for older people,” wrote my colleague, Washington Post columnist Allan Sloan.
knowing what the future holds makes planning for retirement difficult.
It’s possible future Social Security benefits will be cut. Or Congress
might decide to raise the payroll tax that goes toward funding those
programs. Right now, workers pay 6.2 percent, and their employers chip
in another 6.2 percent.
A solution to the shortfall could include raising the full retirement age or a combination of repairs.
you don’t want to do is make a decision of when to start claiming
Social Security based on the fear it won’t be around. The longer you
wait, the more you collect each month. If you claim early at 62, there’s
a reduction of as much as 30 percent. Every year you delay beyond your
full retirement age up to 70, you get an 8 percent increase in your
When you take your benefit depends on your circumstances. You may need to start at 62 if you cannot afford to wait.
doing some retirement preplanning, and while I’m factoring in the
likelihood of some changes to Social Security, I’m trusting that it will
still be there in some form.
One thing is for
sure: Repairing Social Security is necessary, so that’s all the more
reason to start saving as much as you can for retirement. That’s your
hedge against any reform.
you worried that Social Security won’t be there or will be reduced by
the time you’re ready to collect? Send your comments to firstname.lastname@example.org. Please include your name, city and state. In the subject line, put “Social Security.”
Retirement Rants and Raves
interested in your experiences or concerns about retirement or aging.
What do you like about retirement? What came as a surprise?
If you haven’t retired yet, what concerns you financially?
You can rant or rave. This space is yours. It’s a chance for you to express what’s on your mind. Send your comments to email@example.com. Please include your name, city and state. In the subject line put “Retirement Rants and Raves.”
Robert H. of New Jersey
went against conventional advice to wait to collect Social Security. He
wrote, “Because I had a bit of a cash flow problem when I retired at
56, I took my Social Security at 62. What that enabled me to do was
avoid dipping into my 401(k) until age 70.5. Over the 14 years, the
401(k) grew from $700,000 to $2.2 million. Now, the Social Security
payment is small compared with the required withdrawals from the 401(k).
But I feel that the age 62 decision was right.”
Martha Pullen of Strafford, Vt., wrote,
“What I’ve learned about retirement is if you live for today you WILL
pay the piper when you get old. Never count on what you might inherit.
Try hard to save. We did our best and lived frugally. Also you need to
account for the fact that as you age you lose the ability to care for
yourself and that adds much expense to your life.”
“What I was surprised about in retirement was how quickly my husband got sick,” wrote Lucy Troxell of Berryville, Va.
“Within a year, he needed a lung transplant, which required us to
relocate for six months — big bucks maintaining two residences. We were
fortunate in that we could afford this, but many families in the
lung-transplant program (most retired) needed to fundraise. How
frightening it must have been to have financial fears on top of medical
Gayle Edson of Wakefield, Mass.,
wrote, “I retired a few years ago. I started saving for retirement and
saving in general in my late 20s and it has paid off. I find that being
retired requires a different kind of money management. We looked at our
spending and figured out how much we need to live on and where to get
that money. Having saved for retirement was one step; how to manage and
use that money in retirement is another.”